What must a termination clause say in Ontario?
Written by For Founders Law, a Toronto firm licensed by the Law Society of Ontario. About us
Short answer
An Ontario termination clause must never give an employee less than the Employment Standards Act requires, in any circumstance, including notice, termination pay, benefits continuation and severance pay where it applies. If any part of the termination provisions could breach the ESA, Ontario courts may refuse to enforce the clause altogether, leaving the employer owing reasonable notice at common law, which is often much more. Clear wording, consistent "for cause" and "without cause" provisions and regular review are the essentials.
The termination clause is the part of an Ontario employment agreement most likely to be tested, and the part courts read most closely. A clause that works can save months of pay. A clause that fails can leave the agreement as if it said nothing.
Why do courts reject so many clauses?
Because the ESA says employers can’t contract out of its minimum standards, and courts interpret employment contracts in favour of employees. Ontario courts have held that if a termination clause could, in any circumstance, give less than the ESA minimum, it’s void, even if the employer would have paid the minimum in practice.
In Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391, the Court of Appeal for Ontario held that an ESA-compliant “without cause” clause failed because a separate “for cause” clause in the same agreement didn’t comply with the ESA. The termination provisions are read together.
In Dufault v. Ignace (Township), 2024 ONSC 1029, a “for cause” clause that removed all entitlements for conduct short of the ESA’s wilful misconduct standard sank the whole termination scheme. The Court of Appeal dismissed the employer’s appeal on that basis in 2024 ONCA 915, without deciding the lower court’s other concern about wording allowing termination “at any time” in the employer’s “sole discretion,” and the Supreme Court of Canada refused leave to appeal in 2025.
That “at any time” point has since been addressed. In Baker v. Van Dolder’s Home Team Inc., 2026 ONCA 568, heard together with an appeal in Li v. Wayfair Canada ULC, the Court of Appeal held that wording allowing termination “at any time” or “for any reason” doesn’t, on its own, breach the ESA when the agreement read as a whole preserves the employee’s ESA entitlements. Waksdale still stands, so a defective “for cause” clause can still undo a compliant “without cause” clause.
What must the clause provide?
| Element | ESA minimum to respect |
|---|---|
| Notice or termination pay | After three months of employment: one week if under a year, two weeks from one to under three years, then one week per completed year, up to eight weeks |
| Benefits | Continuation of benefit plan contributions during the statutory notice period |
| Severance pay | Where the employer’s payroll is at least $2.5 million, or in some mass terminations, and the employee has five or more years: a week per year, up to 26 weeks. See the severance guide |
| Vacation pay and wages owed | Paid in full |
| “For cause” terminations | The ESA’s standard for losing notice (wilful misconduct, disobedience or wilful neglect of duty that is not trivial and hasn’t been condoned) is narrower than common law just cause |
See how much notice you owe when ending employment.
Which wording causes problems?
- “For cause” clauses that remove all entitlements for anything less than wilful misconduct.
- Clauses that pay only “base salary” during notice, leaving out benefits.
- Broad “at any time” or “sole discretion” language that isn’t tied back to the ESA minimums. After Baker, this wording isn’t fatal by itself, but courts still read the agreement as a whole.
- Clauses that let the employer change duties, pay or location at will, which can raise constructive dismissal and ESA issues if used to make a fundamental change.
- Language that’s ambiguous about whether the employee gets more than the ESA minimum.
Do I need to update old agreements?
Probably, if they were written before 2020 or copied from a template. Changing an existing employee’s termination terms usually needs fresh consideration, such as a raise, bonus or promotion, to be enforceable. New hires should sign before they start.
Can I avoid this by using contractors?
Not if the person is really an employee. See employee or contractor.
What to do next
Our employment agreement template includes termination terms written for the ESA, and we review existing agreements as a contract review. Fees are on our fees page. See also probationary periods and your first hire in Ontario.
This guide is general information about Ontario law, not legal advice for your situation. If you’re about to end someone’s employment, book a free 15-minute consult before you act.
Sources
- Employment Standards Act, 2000 (Ontario), s. 5 (no contracting out), ss. 54 to 61 (notice and termination pay), ss. 63 to 66 (severance pay)
- Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391
- Dufault v. Ignace (Township), 2024 ONCA 915
- Baker v. Van Dolder's Home Team Inc., 2026 ONCA 568
- Ontario: Your guide to the Employment Standards Act, termination of employment
- Ontario: Your guide to the Employment Standards Act, severance pay